Daniel Dines: workflows will go from people-centric to AI-centric
THE SO WHAT
When an automation CEO says he’d pick an AI agent over a human even at higher cost, the optimization function has shifted from labor arbitrage to throughput and control. If you’re designing workflows, assume agents become the default executor and humans the exception—start mapping which steps you’d be comfortable never assigning to a person again.
READ THE SOURCE
MORE FROM THE WIRE
Applied AIPartnering with Edelbyte: Data Infrastructure That Keeps Up With AI's Curiosity
If agents are going to hammer your internal systems with orders of magnitude more queries than humans ever did, the real constraint becomes data infra cost and latency, not model quality. Teams building agents should be budgeting for a new class of OLAP-style infra like Edelbyte’s, not assuming the existing warehouse can take the load.
Applied AIAxiom Math wants to keep AI slop out of mathematics
Formal verification of AI-generated math is a preview of what high-stakes domains will demand—agents that not only propose answers but prove them. If your product leans on symbolic or numerical reasoning, start mapping where you’ll need machine-checkable guarantees versus “best-effort” LLM output.
Show HN: Stroq – a local audit of what your coding agent did and why
Local audit trails for coding agents are the start of “git blame for AI” becoming table stakes in engineering. If you’re rolling out agents to write or modify code, plan for provenance, diff review, and explainability as first-class requirements—not afterthought tooling.
Building a Multi-Agent System from Scratch: Architecture Patterns
Practitioners openly sharing multi-agent architecture patterns suggests the stack is coalescing around a few repeatable designs—planners, tools, and critics. Teams experimenting with agents should copy proven patterns before inventing new ones; your differentiation is likely in domain data, not orchestration logic.