Meta thought AI could do the job instead of humans — what happened next should surprise absolutely nobody
THE SO WHAT
Trying to replace up to 60% of a workforce with AI and watching it backfire is a case study in overestimating current capabilities and underestimating organizational complexity. The viable pattern is augmentation plus redesign of workflows—not headcount swap-outs at scale—so treat any ‘X% replacement’ narrative as a risk flag, not a target.
READ THE SOURCE
MORE FROM THE WIRE
Applied AIBeyond slop, taste, and AI moral panic: What social science tells us
If taste is learned and AI is now a primary teacher, recommendation systems become cultural infrastructure, not just engagement levers. Operators curating feeds — in media, commerce, or education — are quietly deciding which futures users learn to want.
Applied AIAI Data Center Demand Isn’t Slowing: Southern CEO
When a major utility CEO says AI data center demand isn’t slowing and signs 25-year power deals, compute planning has officially merged with grid planning. If you depend on large-scale training or inference, you now have to underwrite power, transmission, and permitting risk alongside GPU supply.
Applied AIMizuho’s Rakesh Sees Wall Street Drilling In on Nvidia Spending
With a “big beat” already priced in, the real question for Nvidia is how long hyperscale AI capex can compound at current rates. If you’re building on their stack, watch guidance on AI spend mix and pace — it’s a proxy for how long the current GPU-first architecture window stays open.
Applied AIScreenless Luffu Link Is the Next Wearable From the Founders of Fitbit
A screenless, LTE health and safety band tied into an AI monitoring stack is a bet that ambient, always-on sensing beats app-centric UX for families. For health and safety operators, the opportunity is in longitudinal data and interventions — not the device itself.